OpenControls Logo

STIG Viewer

STIGViewer Support

The UEM server must protect the authenticity of communications sessions.

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-234405SRG-APP-000219-UEM-000132SV-234405r1213042_ruleCCI-001184medium
Description
Authenticity protection provides protection against man-in-the-middle attacks/session hijacking and the insertion of false information into sessions. Application communication sessions are protected utilizing transport encryption protocols, such as TLS. TLS provides web applications with a means to be able to authenticate user sessions and encrypt application traffic. Session authentication can be single (one-way) or mutual (two-way) in nature. Single authentication authenticates the server for the client, whereas mutual authentication provides a means for both the client and the server to authenticate each other. This requirement applies to applications that utilize communications sessions. This includes, but is not limited to, web-based applications and Service-Oriented Architectures (SOA). This requirement addresses communications protection at the application session, versus the network packet, and establishes grounds for confidence at both ends of communications sessions in ongoing identities of other parties and in the validity of information transmitted. Depending on the required degree of confidentiality and integrity, web services/SOA will require the use of TLS mutual authentication (two-way/bidirectional). Satisfies:FIA_ENR_EXT.1.1, FTP_TRP.1.2/TRUSTPATH_REM_ADMIN, FTP_TRP.1.1/TRUSTPATH_REM_ADMIN
STIGDate
Unified Endpoint Management Server Security Requirements Guide2026-06-11

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 4 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

NET-09Session Integrity
1.00
NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (30) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-17(2)Protection of Confidentiality and Integrity Using Encryption
1.00
AU-10(1)Association of Identities
1.00
AU-10(2)Validate Binding of Information Producer Identity
1.00
AU-9(3)Cryptographic Protection
1.00
CM-14Signed Components
1.00
CM-5(3)Signed Components
1.00
CM-6Configuration Settings
1.00
CM-7Least Functionality
1.00
IA-2(1)Multi-factor Authentication to Privileged Accounts
1.00
IA-2(12)Acceptance of PIV Credentials
1.00

+20 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-1710 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

3.13.15
1.00
CCI1 mapping
CCI-001184
1.00

Details

Check Text (C-234405r1213042_chk)

Verify the UEM server protects the authenticity of communications sessions. If the UEM server does not protect the authenticity of communications sessions, this is a finding.

Fix Text (F-37555r614226_fix)

Configure the UEM server to protect the authenticity of communications sessions.