STIGViewer Support

Symantec ProxySG must be configured to enforce assigned privilege levels for approved administrators when accessing the management console, SSH, and the command line interface (CLI).

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-94659SYMP-NM-000040SV-104489r1_ruleCCI-001368medium
Description
A mechanism to detect and prevent unauthorized communication flow must be configured or provided as part of the system design. If management information flow is not enforced based on approved authorizations, the network device may become compromised. Information flow control regulates where management information is allowed to travel within a network device. The flow of all management information must be monitored and controlled so it does not introduce any unacceptable risk to the network device or data. Application-specific examples of enforcement occur in systems that employ rule sets or establish configuration settings that restrict information system services or message-filtering capability based on message content (e.g., implementing key word searches or using document characteristics). Applications providing information flow control must be able to enforce approved authorizations for controlling the flow of management information within the system in accordance with applicable policy.
STIGDate
Symantec ProxySG NDM Security Technical Implementation Guide2019-12-20

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 5 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (17) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AST-04Network Diagrams & Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs)
1.00
AST-04.2Control Applicability Boundary Graphical Representation
1.00
CFG-02Secure Baseline Configurations
1.00
CRY-01Use of Cryptographic Controls
1.00
DCH-01Data Protection
1.00
DCH-19Geographic Location of Data
1.00
END-01Endpoint Device Management (EDM)
1.00
END-04Malicious Code Protection (Anti-Malware)
1.00
END-06Endpoint File Integrity Monitoring (FIM)
1.00
IAC-21Least Privilege
1.00

+7 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (42) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-2(1)Automated System Account Management
1.00
AC-2(10)Shared and Group Account Credential Change
1.00
AC-2(2)Automated Temporary and Emergency Account Management
1.00
AC-2(3)Disable Accounts
1.00
AC-2(4)Automated Audit Actions
1.00
AC-3Access Enforcement
1.00
AC-3(7)Role-based Access Control
1.00
AC-4Information Flow Enforcement
1.00
AC-6(10)Prohibit Non-privileged Users from Executing Privileged Functions
1.00
AC-6(9)Log Use of Privileged Functions
1.00

+32 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-1710 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

3.1.3
1.00
CCI1 mapping
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (4) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

Who does this work

18 NICE work roles and 10 EC-Council certifications.

This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.

A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.

Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.

Details

Check Text (C-104489r1_chk)

1. Obtain a list of authorized personnel and IP addresses that should have access to the Web Management Console or CLI. 2. Click Configuration >> Policy >> Visual Policy Manager. 3. Click the "Launch button". 4. Click the "Admin Access" layer. 5. Verify any users and/or groups listed in the "source" field of each rule have the appropriate Action of either "Allow Read/Write access" or "Allow Read-only Access" per the user/group’s assigned privileges. 6. Verify that the users and/or groups have the Service set to "SSH-Console", "HTTPS-Console", or both, depending on the user/group’s assigned privileges. 7. Ensure the account of last resort is not allowed access via the "SSH-Console" or the "HTTPS-Console", but only via the local console port and CLI. If the Symantec ProxySG is not configured to enforce assigned privilege levels for approved administrators when accessing the Management Console and the CLI, this is a finding.

Fix Text (F-100777r1_fix)

1. Obtain a list of authorized personnel and IP addresses that should have access to the Web Management Console or CLI. 2. Click Configuration >> Policy >> Visual Policy Manager. 3. Click the "Launch" button. 4. Click the "Admin Access" layer. 5. For every user and/or group listed in the "source" field of each rule, set the Action to either "Allow Read/Write access" or "Allow Read-only Access" per the user/group’s assigned privileges. 6. For every user/group, also set the Service to "SSH-Console", "HTTPS-Console", or both, per the user/group’s assigned privileges. 7. Configure the account of last resort to disallow access via the "SSH-Console" and the "HTTPS-Console". Access is only allowed via the local console port and CLI. Note that DoD requires users to be assigned to groups rather than assigned privileges to individual users whenever possible.