OpenControls Logo

STIG Viewer

STIGViewer Support

SLEM 5, for PKI-based authentication, must validate certificates by constructing a certification path (which includes status information) to an accepted trust anchor.

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-261401SLEM-05-631020SV-261401r996622_ruleCCI-000185medium
Description
Without path validation, an informed trust decision by the relying party cannot be made when presented with any certificate not already explicitly trusted. A trust anchor is an authoritative entity represented via a public key and associated data. It is used in the context of public key infrastructures, X.509 digital certificates, and DNSSEC. When there is a chain of trust, usually the top entity to be trusted becomes the trust anchor; it can be, for example, a Certification Authority (CA). A certification path starts with the subject certificate and proceeds through a number of intermediate certificates up to a trusted root certificate, typically issued by a trusted CA. This requirement verifies that a certification path to an accepted trust anchor is used for certificate validation and that the path includes status information. Path validation is necessary for a relying party to make an informed trust decision when presented with any certificate not already explicitly trusted. Status information for certification paths includes certificate revocation lists or online certificate status protocol responses. Validation of the certificate status information is out of scope for this requirement.
STIGDate
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro (SLEM) 5 Security Technical Implementation Guide2025-05-08

Related Frameworks

2 mappings across 3 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

IAC-10.2PKI-Based Authentication
1.00
NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (64) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-10Concurrent Session Control
1.00
AC-12Session Termination
1.00
AC-17(10)Authenticate Remote Commands
1.00
AC-17(2)Protection of Confidentiality and Integrity Using Encryption
1.00
AC-2(1)Automated System Account Management
1.00
AC-2(10)Shared and Group Account Credential Change
1.00
AC-2(11)Usage Conditions
1.00
AC-2(2)Automated Temporary and Emergency Account Management
1.00
AC-2(3)Disable Accounts
1.00
AC-2(4)Automated Audit Actions
1.00

+54 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

CCI2 mappings
CCI-000185
1.00
CCI-001991
1.00

Details

Check Text (C-261401r996622_chk)

Verify SLEM 5 for PKI-based authentication had valid certificates by constructing a certification path (which includes status information) to an accepted trust anchor with the following command: > grep cert_policy /etc/pam_pkcs11/pam_pkcs11.conf cert_policy = ca,oscp_on,signature,crl_auto; If "cert_policy" is not set to include "ca" on all returned lines, this is a finding.

Fix Text (F-65038r996621_fix)

Configure SLEM 5 for PKI-based authentication to validate certificates by constructing a certification path (which includes status information) to an accepted trust anchor. Modify all of the cert_policy lines in "/etc/pam_pkcs11/pam_pkcs11.conf" to include "ca": cert_policy = ca,signature,oscp_on; Note: Additional certificate validation polices are permitted. Additional information on the configuration of multifactor authentication on SLEM 5 can be found at https://www.suse.com/communities/blog/configuring-smart-card-authentication-suse-linux-enterprise/.