STIGViewer Support

The operating system must use cryptographic mechanisms to protect and restrict access to information on portable digital media.

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-216411SOL-11.1-060140SV-216411r959010_ruleCCI-000366medium
Description
When data is written to portable digital media, such as thumb drives, floppy diskettes, compact disks, and magnetic tape, etc., there is risk of data loss. An organizational assessment of risk guides the selection of media and associated information contained on the media requiring restricted access. Organizations need to document in policy and procedures the media requiring restricted access, individuals authorized to access the media, and the specific measures taken to restrict access. Fewer protection measures are needed for media containing information determined by the organization to be in the public domain, to be publicly releasable, or to have limited or no adverse impact if accessed by other than authorized personnel. In these situations, it is assumed the physical access controls where the media resides provide adequate protection. The employment of cryptography is at the discretion of the information owner/steward. When the organization has determined the risk warrants it, data written to portable digital media must be encrypted.
STIGDate
Solaris 11 SPARC Security Technical Implementation Guide2026-05-13

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 5 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (8) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

CFG-01Configuration Management Program
1.00
END-01Endpoint Device Management (EDM)
1.00
END-04Malicious Code Protection (Anti-Malware)
1.00
END-06Endpoint File Integrity Monitoring (FIM)
1.00
MON-01Continuous Monitoring
1.00
MON-01.7File Integrity Monitoring (FIM)
1.00
CFG-02Secure Baseline Configurations
0.50
CFG-02.7Approved Configuration Deviations
0.50
NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (100) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-12Session Termination
1.00
AC-16(1)Dynamic Attribute Association
1.00
AC-17(1)Monitoring and Control
1.00
AC-2Account Management
1.00
AC-2(1)Automated System Account Management
1.00
AC-2(11)Usage Conditions
1.00
AC-2(3)Disable Accounts
1.00
AC-2(4)Automated Audit Actions
1.00
AC-24(1)Transmit Access Authorization Information
1.00
AC-25Reference Monitor
1.00

+90 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-1710 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (2) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

3.4.1
1.00
3.4.2
1.00
CCI1 mapping
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (5) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

PR.PSPlatform Security
0.50

Who does this work

10 NICE work roles and 9 EC-Council certifications.

This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.

A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.

Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.

Details

Check Text (C-216411r959010_chk)

This check applies to the global zone only. Determine the zone that you are currently securing. # zonename If the command output is "global", this check applies. Determine the logical node of all attached removable media: # rmformat This command lists all attached removable devices. Note the device logical node name. For example: /dev/rdsk/c8t0d0p0 Determine which zpool is mapped to the device: # zpool status Determine the file system names of the portable digital media: # zfs list | grep [poolname] Using the file system name, determine if the removal media is encrypted: # zfs get encryption [filesystem] If "encryption off" is listed, this is a finding.

Fix Text (F-17645r371322_fix)

The root role is required. Format a removable device as a ZFS encrypted file system. This action applies to the global zone only. Determine the zone that you are currently securing. # zonename If the command output is "global", this action applies. The ZFS File System Management and ZFS Storage management profiles are required. Insert the removable device: # rmformat This command lists all attached removable devices. Note the device logical node name. For example: /dev/rdsk/c8t0d0p0 Create an encrypted zpool on this device using a poolname of your choice: # pfexec zpool create -O encryption=on [poolname] c8t0d0p0 Enter a passphrase and confirm the passphrase. Keep the passphrase secure. Export the zpool before removing the media: # pfexec export [poolname] It will be necessary to enter the passphrase when inserting and importing the removable media zpool: Insert the removable media # pfexec import [poolname] Only store data in the encrypted file system.