OpenControls Logo

STIG Viewer

STIGViewer Support

RHEL 10 must be configured to employ a deny-all, permit-by-exception policy to allow the execution of authorized software programs.

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-280971RHEL-10-200602SV-280971r1184780_ruleCCI-001764medium
Description
The organization must identify authorized software programs and permit execution of authorized software. The process used to identify software programs that are authorized to execute on organizational information systems is commonly referred to as allowlisting. Using an allowlist provides a configuration management method for allowing the execution of only authorized software. Using only authorized software decreases risk by limiting the number of potential vulnerabilities. Verification of allowlisted software occurs prior to execution or at system startup. User home directories/folders may contain information of a sensitive nature. Nonprivileged users should coordinate any sharing of information with a system administrator through shared resources. RHEL 10 ships with many optional packages. One such package is a file access policy daemon called "fapolicyd". The "fapolicyd" is a userspace daemon that determines access rights to files based on attributes of the process and file. It can be used to either block list or allowlist processes or file access. Proceed with caution with enforcing the use of this daemon. Improper configuration may render the system nonfunctional. The "fapolicyd" application programming interface (API) is not namespace aware and can cause issues when launching or running containers. Satisfies: SRG-OS-000368-GPOS-00154, SRG-OS-000370-GPOS-00155
STIGDate
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 Security Technical Implementation Guide2026-03-11

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 5 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (7) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

CFG-01Configuration Management Program
1.00
CFG-02Secure Baseline Configurations
1.00
CFG-03Least Functionality
1.00
CFG-03.2Prevent Unauthorized Software Execution
1.00
CFG-05User-Installed Software
1.00
END-03Prohibit Installation Without Privileged Status
1.00
SEA-06Prevent Program Execution
0.50
NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (44) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-2(1)Automated System Account Management
1.00
AC-2(10)Shared and Group Account Credential Change
1.00
AC-2(2)Automated Temporary and Emergency Account Management
1.00
AC-2(3)Disable Accounts
1.00
AC-2(4)Automated Audit Actions
1.00
AC-3Access Enforcement
1.00
AC-3(4)Discretionary Access Control
1.00
AC-4Information Flow Enforcement
1.00
AC-6(10)Prohibit Non-privileged Users from Executing Privileged Functions
1.00
AC-6(8)Privilege Levels for Code Execution
1.00

+34 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-1710 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

3.4.7
1.00
CCI1 mapping
CCI-001764
1.00
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

PR.PS-05
1.00

Who does this work

8 NICE work roles and 8 EC-Council certifications.

This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.

A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.

Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.

Details

Check Text (C-280971r1184780_chk)

Verify the RHEL 10 "fapolicyd" employs a deny-all, permit-by-exception policy. Check that "fapolicyd" is in enforcement mode with the following command: $ sudo grep permissive /etc/fapolicyd/fapolicyd.conf permissive = 0 If "fapolicyd" is not running in enforcement mode, this is a finding. Check that "fapolicyd" employs a deny-all policy on system mounts with the following commands: $ sudo tail /etc/fapolicyd/compiled.rules allow exe=/usr/bin/python3.7 : ftype=text/x-python deny_audit perm=any pattern=ld_so : all deny perm=any all : all If "fapolicyd" is not running with a deny-all, permit-by-exception policy, this is a finding. Note: "deny_log" or "deny_audit" options meet the security requirements. These options will generate higher volumes of logs.

Fix Text (F-85437r1184779_fix)

Configure RHEL 10 to employ a deny-all, permit-by-exception application allow listing policy with "fapolicyd". With the "fapolicyd" installed and enabled, configure the daemon to function in permissive mode until the allow list is built correctly to avoid system lockout. Do this by editing the "/etc/fapolicyd/fapolicyd.conf" file with the following line: permissive = 1 Build the allow list in a file within the "/etc/fapolicyd/rules.d" directory, ensuring the last rule implements a deny-all policy, such as "deny perm=any all : all". Once it is determined the allow list is built correctly, set the "fapolicyd" to enforcing mode by editing the "permissive" line in the /etc/fapolicyd/fapolicyd.conf file. permissive = 0