STIGViewer Support

Prisma Cloud Compute must run within a defined/separate namespace (e.g., Twistlock).

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-253547CNTR-PC-001380SV-253547r1137646_ruleCCI-002530medium
Description
Namespaces are a key boundary for network policies, orchestrator access control restrictions, and other important security controls. Prisma Cloud Compute containers running within a separate and exclusive namespace will inherit the namespace's security features. Separating workloads into namespaces can help contain attacks and limit the impact of mistakes or destructive actions by authorized users.
STIGDate
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud Compute Security Technical Implementation Guide2026-02-13

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 4 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (11) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

BCD-01Business Continuity Management System (BCMS)
1.00
CFG-02Secure Baseline Configurations
1.00
CRY-01Use of Cryptographic Controls
1.00
CRY-01.1Alternate Physical Protection
1.00
CRY-05Encrypting Data At Rest
1.00
DCH-01Data Protection
1.00
IAC-21Least Privilege
1.00
SEA-01Secure Engineering Principles
1.00
SEA-01.2Achieving Resilience Requirements
1.00
SEA-02Alignment With Enterprise Architecture
1.00

+1 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (7) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-6(8)Privilege Levels for Code Execution
1.00
CM-7Least Functionality
1.00
SC-18(3)Prevent Downloading and Execution
1.00
SC-2Separation of System and User Functionality
1.00
SC-39Process Isolation
1.00
SC-4Information in Shared System Resources
1.00
SI-16Memory Protection
1.00
CCI1 mapping
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (3) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

Who does this work

13 NICE work roles and 8 EC-Council certifications.

This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.

A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.

Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.

Details

Check Text (C-253547r1137646_chk)

Inspect the Kubernetes namespace in which Prisma Cloud Compute is deployed: $ kubectl get pods -n twistlock NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE twistlock-console-855744b66b-xs9cm 1/1 Running 0 4d6h twistlock-defender-ds-99zj7 1/1 Running 0 58d twistlock-defender-ds-drsh8 1/1 Running 0 58d Inspect the list of pods. If a non-Prisma Cloud Compute (does not start with "twistlock") pod is running in the same namespace, this is a finding.

Fix Text (F-56950r840478_fix)

Deploy the Prisma Cloud Compute Console and Defender containers within a distinct namespace.