OpenControls Logo

STIG Viewer

STIGViewer Support

A Windows PAW must only be used to manage high-value IT resources assigned to the same tier.

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-243445WPAW-00-000500SV-243445r991589_ruleCCI-000366medium
Description
Note: Allowed exception - For sites that are constrained in the number of available workstations, an acceptable approach is to install lower-tier administrative accounts on a separate virtual machine (VM) on the PAW workstation where higher-tier administrative accounts are installed on the host OS and lower-tier administrative accounts are installed in a VM. The VM will provide acceptable isolation between administrative accounts of different tiers. Note: Relationship between the exception in WPAW-00-000500 and WPAW-00-001000 and requirement WPAW-00-001800: WPAW-00-000500 and WPAW-00-001000 allow an exception to the requirement for sites constrained in the number of available workstations. Lower-tier, high-value admin accounts can operate in a VM if the higher-tier, high-value admin accounts operate in the VM host-OS, but WPAW-00-001800 is more appropriate for a multiple PAW VM environment. If administrative accounts assigned to different tiers were installed on the same PAW, it would be impossible to isolate administrative accounts to specific trust zones and protect IT resources from one trust zone (tier) from threats from high-risk trust zones.
STIGDate
Microsoft Windows PAW Security Technical Implementation Guide2025-05-23

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 5 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (8) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

CFG-01Configuration Management Program
1.00
END-01Endpoint Device Management (EDM)
1.00
END-04Malicious Code Protection (Anti-Malware)
1.00
END-06Endpoint File Integrity Monitoring (FIM)
1.00
MON-01Continuous Monitoring
1.00
MON-01.7File Integrity Monitoring (FIM)
1.00
CFG-02Secure Baseline Configurations
0.50
CFG-02.7Approved Configuration Deviations
0.50
NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (100) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-12Session Termination
1.00
AC-16(1)Dynamic Attribute Association
1.00
AC-17(1)Monitoring and Control
1.00
AC-2Account Management
1.00
AC-2(1)Automated System Account Management
1.00
AC-2(11)Usage Conditions
1.00
AC-2(3)Disable Accounts
1.00
AC-2(4)Automated Audit Actions
1.00
AC-24(1)Transmit Access Authorization Information
1.00
AC-25Reference Monitor
1.00

+90 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-1710 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (2) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

3.4.1
1.00
3.4.2
1.00
CCI1 mapping
CCI-000366
1.00
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (5) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

DE.CM-09
1.00
PR.PS-01
1.00
PR.DS-10
0.50
PR.PSPlatform Security
0.50
PR.PS-05
0.50

Who does this work

10 NICE work roles and 9 EC-Council certifications.

This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.

A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.

Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.

Details

Check Text (C-243445r991589_chk)

Verify that a site has set aside one or more PAWs for remote management of high-value IT resources assigned to a specific tier. Review any available site documentation. Verify that any PAW used to manage high-value IT resources of a specific tier are used exclusively for managing high-value IT resources assigned to one and only one tier. If the site has not set aside one or more PAWs for remote management of high-value IT resources assigned to a specific tier, this is a finding. If PAWs used for managing high-value IT resources are used for additional functions, this is a finding.

Fix Text (F-46677r722905_fix)

Set aside one or more PAWs for remote management of high-value IT resources assigned to a specific tier. For example, using the Microsoft Tier 0-2 model, each PAW would be assigned to manage either Tier 0, Tier 1, or Tier 2 high-value IT resources.