Exchange Receive connector Maximum Hop Count must be 60.
Overview
| Finding ID | Version | Rule ID | IA Controls | Severity |
| V-221226 | EX16-ED-000270 | SV-221226r961155_rule | CCI-001095 | medium |
| Description | ||||
| Email system availability depends in part on best practice strategies for setting tuning configurations. This setting controls the maximum number of hops (email servers traversed) a message may take as it travels to its destination. Part of the original Internet protocol implementation, the hop count limit prevents a message from being passed in a routing loop indefinitely. Messages exceeding the maximum hop count are discarded undelivered. Recent studies indicate that virtually all messages can be delivered in fewer than 60 hops. If the hop count is set too low, messages may expire before they reach their destinations. If set too high, an undeliverable message may cycle between servers, raising the risk of network congestion. | ||||
| STIG | Date | |||
| Microsoft Exchange 2016 Edge Transport Server Security Technical Implementation Guide | 2024-12-06 | |||
Related Frameworks
1 mapping across 4 frameworks
Related Frameworks
SCF0 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 3 hops (2) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R6intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R6intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
NIST 800-530 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 2 hops (13) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R6intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R6intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2our copyintersects(normalised)DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R9our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R9intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R6intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R6intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V10R7our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V10R7intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R6intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R6intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V3R3our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V3R3intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R6intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R6intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R6intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R6intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V10R7our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V10R7intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
+3 more (top 10 by confidence shown)
CCI1 mapping
CCI-001095
1.00
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R6intersects(normalised)
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 4 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
PR.IR-04
0.50
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R6intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 153 (2025-04-07)intersects(normalised)SCF Focal Document mapping (catalog)SCF 2026.2 focalintersects(normalised)
Details
Check Text (C-221226r961155_chk)
Review the Email Domain Security Plan (EDSP).
Determine the value for Receive connectors.
Open the Exchange Management Shell and enter the following command:
Get-ReceiveConnector | Select Name, Identity, MaxHopCount
For each receive connector, if the value of "MaxHopCount" is not set to "60", this is a finding.
or
If the value of "MaxHopCount" is set to a value other than "60" and has signoff and risk acceptance, this is not a finding.
Fix Text (F-22930r411805_fix)
Update the EDSP to reflect the value for Receive connectors.
Open the Exchange Management Shell and enter the following command:
Set-ReceiveConnector -Identity <'IdentityName'> -MaxHopCount 60
Note: The <IdentityName> value must be in single quotes.
or
The value as identified by the EDSP that has obtained a signoff with risk acceptance.
Repeat the procedure for each receive connector.