STIGViewer Support

IBM z/OS system commands must be properly protected.

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-223655RACF-ES-000070SV-223655r1137691_ruleCCI-000213medium
Description
z/OS system commands provide a method of controlling the operating environment. Failure to properly control access to z/OS system commands could result in unauthorized personnel issuing sensitive system commands. This exposure may threaten the integrity and availability of the operating system environment, and compromise the confidentiality of customer data.
STIGDate
IBM z/OS RACF Security Technical Implementation Guide2026-06-03

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 5 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (20) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

CFG-02Secure Baseline Configurations
1.00
CRY-01Use of Cryptographic Controls
1.00
DCH-01Data Protection
1.00
HRS-02Position Categorization
1.00
HRS-11Separation of Duties (SoD)
1.00
IAC-01Identity & Access Management (IAM)
1.00
IAC-01.2Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA)
1.00
IAC-02Identification & Authentication for Organizational Users
1.00
IAC-03Identification & Authentication for Non-Organizational Users
1.00
IAC-04Identification & Authentication for Devices
1.00

+10 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (93) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-10Concurrent Session Control
1.00
AC-16Security and Privacy Attributes
1.00
AC-17(1)Monitoring and Control
1.00
AC-17(10)Authenticate Remote Commands
1.00
AC-17(2)Protection of Confidentiality and Integrity Using Encryption
1.00
AC-18(1)Authentication and Encryption
1.00
AC-2(1)Automated System Account Management
1.00
AC-2(10)Shared and Group Account Credential Change
1.00
AC-2(11)Usage Conditions
1.00
AC-2(2)Automated Temporary and Emergency Account Management
1.00

+83 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-1710 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (2) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

3.1.1
1.00
3.1.2
1.00
CCI1 mapping
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (3) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

Who does this work

17 NICE work roles and 9 EC-Council certifications.

This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.

A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.

Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.

Details

Check Text (C-223655r1137691_chk)

From the ISPF Command Shell enter: RList OPERCMDS * If the MVS.** resource is defined to the OPERCMDS class with an access of NONE and all (i.e., failures and successes) access logged, this is not a finding. If the access to z/OS system commands defined in the table entitled MVS commands, RACF access authorities, and resource names, in the IBM z/OS MVS System Commands manual, is restricted to the appropriate personnel (e.g., operations staff, systems programming personnel, general users) as determined in the Documented site Security Plan, this is not a finding. Note: Display commands and others as deemed by the site IAW site security plan may be allowed for all users with no logging. The (MVS.SEND) Command will not be a finding if used by all. If all access (i.e., failures and successes) to specific z/OS system commands is logged as indicated in the table entitled MVS commands, RACF access authorities, and resource names, in the z/OS MVS System Commands, this is not a finding.

Fix Text (F-25316r514655_fix)

z/OS system commands provide control over z/OS functions and can compromise security if misused. These commands are subject to various types of potential abuse. For this reason, it is necessary to place restrictions on the z/OS system commands that can be entered by particular operators. Some commands are particularly dangerous and should only be used when all less drastic options have been exhausted. Misuse of these commands can create a situation in which the only recovery is an IPL. Apply the following recommendations when implementing security: The MVS.** resource is defined to the OPERCMDS class with an access of NONE and all (i.e., failures and successes) access logged. Access to z/OS system commands defined in the entitled MVS commands, RACF access authorities, and resource names, in the IBM z/OS MVS System Commands manual is restricted to the appropriate personnel (e.g., operations staff, systems programming personnel, general users). The (MVS.SEND) Command will not be a finding if used by all. Display commands and others as deemed by the site IAW site security plan may be allowed for all users with no logging. The (MVS.SEND) Command will not be a finding if used by all. All elevated access (i.e., failures and successes) to specific z/OS system commands is logged. A sample set of commands to define and permit access to system command resources is shown here: RDEF OPERCMDS MVS.** UACC(NONE) OWNER(<syspsmpl>) AUDIT(ALL(READ)) DATA("set up deny-by-default profile') Then, in accordance with the referenced table, use the following template to define profiles for each command: RDEF OPERCMDS <system command profile> UACC(NONE) OWNER(<syspsmpl>) AUDIT(ALL(READ)) PERMIT <system command profile> CLASS(OPERCMDS) ID(<groupname>) ACCESS(<accesslevel>)