The WebSphere Liberty Server must be configured to encrypt log information.
Overview
| Finding ID | Version | Rule ID | IA Controls | Severity |
| V-250330 | IBMW-LS-000320 | SV-250330r960951_rule | CCI-000162 | medium |
| Description | ||||
| Protection of log records is of critical importance. Encrypting log records provides a level of protection that does not rely on host-based protections that can be accidentally misconfigured, such as file system permissions. Cryptographic mechanisms are the industry-established standard used to protect the integrity of log data. An example of a cryptographic mechanism is the computation and application of a cryptographic-signed hash using asymmetric cryptography. - The security feature (appSecurity-2.0) must be defined in order to configure a user registry for the servlet to authenticate against. - The audit feature (audit-1.0) must be defined in order to generate audit records. - The servlet feature (servlet-3.1) must be defined to be able to deploy a web application. - The ejb feature (ejbLite-3.1) must be defined to be able to deploy an ejb application. - The ssl feature (ssl-1.0) must be defined to be able to generate and use certificates to sign and encrypt logs. - The ldap feature (ldapRegistry-3.0) must be defined in order to configure an enterprise-level user registry to authenticate users against. When the audit-1.0 feature is defined, all supported audit events will be captured and logged to an audit.log located under ${server.config.dir}/logs. The audit log that is currently being logged to is called audit.log. When an audit log fills to a configured maximum capacity, it is archived with a timestamp with the naming convention audit_<timestamp>.log and new records are written to audit.log. The audit logs are found under the ${server.config.dir}/logs directory and are named audit.log for the most recent, and audit_<timestamp>.log for any archived logs. One keystore needs to be created (ikeyman as part of the JDK may be used) and a personal certificate created. This certificate is used to encrypt the logs. The audit configuration needs to define the location of this keystore, its password, and the alias of the certificate used to encrypt the logs. As an example: <keyStore id="auditEncKeyStore" password="Liberty" location="${server.config.dir}/resources/security/AuditEncryptionKeyStore.jks" type="JKS" /> <keyStore id="auditSignKeyStore" password="{xor}EzY9Oi0rJg==" location="${server.config.dir}/resources/security/AuditSigningKeyStore2.jks" type="JKS" /> <auditFileHandler encrypt="true" encryptAlias="auditencryption" encryptKeyStoreRef="auditEncKeyStore" </auditFileHandler> Satisfies: SRG-APP-000126-AS-000085, SRG-APP-000118-AS-000078, SRG-APP-000267-AS-000170 | ||||
| STIG | Date | |||
| IBM WebSphere Liberty Server Security Technical Implementation Guide | 2025-02-11 | |||
Related Frameworks
3 mappings across 5 frameworks
Related Frameworks
SCF0 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 3 hops (7) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 186 (2025-11-17)intersects(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 153 (2025-04-07)intersects(normalised)SCF Focal Document mapping (catalog)SCF 2026.2 focalintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 186 (2025-11-17)intersects(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 153 (2025-04-07)intersects(normalised)SCF Focal Document mapping (catalog)SCF 2026.2 focalintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 186 (2025-11-17)intersects(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 153 (2025-04-07)intersects(normalised)SCF Focal Document mapping (catalog)SCF 2026.2 focalintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 186 (2025-11-17)intersects(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 153 (2025-04-07)intersects(normalised)SCF Focal Document mapping (catalog)SCF 2026.2 focalintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2equal to
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2equal to
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2equal to
NIST 800-530 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 2 hops (64) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
+54 more (top 10 by confidence shown)
NIST 800-1710 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 3 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2, Appendix DRev 2 (Feb 2020, errata Jan 2021)equal to(normalised)
CCI3 mappings
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 3 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 131 (2025-12-12)intersects(normalised)NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 186 (2025-11-17)intersects(normalised)
Who does this work
7 NICE work roles and 7 EC-Council certifications.
Who does this work
7 NICE work roles and 7 EC-Council certifications.
This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.
A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.
- DD-WRL-003Secure Software Development
- DD-WRL-004Secure Systems Development
- DD-WRL-007Systems Testing and Evaluation
- IO-WRL-002Database Administration
- IO-WRL-005Systems Administration
- IO-WRL-006Systems Security Analysis
- PD-WRL-001Defensive Cybersecurity
Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.