DB2 must isolate security functions from non-security functions.
Overview
| Finding ID | Version | Rule ID | IA Controls | Severity |
| V-213707 | DB2X-00-005500 | SV-213707r961131_rule | CCI-001084 | medium |
| Description | ||||
| An isolation boundary provides access control and protects the integrity of the hardware, software, and firmware that perform security functions. Security functions are the hardware, software, and/or firmware of the information system responsible for enforcing the system security policy and supporting the isolation of code and data on which the protection is based. Developers and implementers can increase the assurance in security functions by employing well-defined security policy models; structured, disciplined, and rigorous hardware and software development techniques; and sound system/security engineering principles. Database Management Systems typically separate security functionality from non-security functionality via separate databases or schemas. Database objects or code implementing security functionality should not be commingled with objects or code implementing application logic. When security and non-security functionality are commingled, users who have access to non-security functionality may be able to access security functionality. | ||||
| STIG | Date | |||
| IBM DB2 V10.5 LUW Security Technical Implementation Guide | 2026-05-23 | |||
Related Frameworks
1 mapping across 3 frameworks
Related Frameworks
SCF0 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 3 hops (2) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
NIST 800-530 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 2 hops (29) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)3our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)3intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
+19 more (top 10 by confidence shown)
CCI1 mapping
CCI-001084
1.00
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
Details
Check Text (C-213707r961131_chk)
Determine application-specific security objects (lists of permissions, additional authentication information, stored procedures, application specific auditing, etc.) which are being housed inside DB2 database in addition to the built-in security objects.
Review permissions, both direct and indirect, on the security objects, both built-in and application-specific. The following functions and views provided can help with this:
DB2> SELECT LIBNAME, OWNER, LIBSCHEMA FROM SYSCAT.LIBRARIES
DB2> SELECT MODULENAME, OWNER, MODULESCHEMA FROM SYSCAT.MODULES
DB2> SELECT PKGNAME, OWNER, PKGSCHEMA FROM SYSCAT.PACKAGES
DB2> SELECT ROUTINENAME, OWNER, ROUTINESCHEMA FROM SYSCAT.ROUTINES
DB2> SELECT TRIGNAME, OWNER, TRIGSCHEMA FROM SYSCAT.TRIGGERS
DB2> SELECT * FROM SYSIBMADM.PRIVILEGES
If the database(s), schema(s) and permissions on security objects are not organized to provide effective isolation of security functions from nonsecurity functions, this is a finding.
Fix Text (F-14926r295171_fix)
Where possible, locate security-related database objects and code in a separate database, schema, or other separate security domain from database objects and code implementing application logic.
In all cases, use GRANT, REVOKE, ALTER ROLE, DROP ROLE, statements to add and remove permissions on security-related objects to provide effective isolation.