STIGViewer Support

DB2 must limit the number of concurrent sessions to an organization-defined number per user for all accounts and/or account types.

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-213670DB2X-00-000200SV-213670r960735_ruleCCI-000054medium
Description
Database management includes the ability to control the number of users and user sessions utilizing a DBMS. Unlimited concurrent connections to the DBMS could allow a successful Denial of Service (DoS) attack by exhausting connection resources; and a system can also fail or be degraded by an overload of legitimate users. Limiting the number of concurrent sessions per user is helpful in reducing these risks. This requirement addresses concurrent session control for a single account. It does not address concurrent sessions by a single user via multiple system accounts; and it does not deal with the total number of sessions across all accounts. The capability to limit the number of concurrent sessions per user must be configured in or added to the DBMS (for example, by use of a logon trigger), when this is technically feasible. Note that it is not sufficient to limit sessions via a web server or application server alone, because legitimate users and adversaries can potentially connect to the DBMS by other means. The organization will need to define the maximum number of concurrent sessions by account type, by account, or a combination thereof. In deciding on the appropriate number, it is important to consider the work requirements of the various types of users. For example, 2 might be an acceptable limit for general users accessing the database via an application; but 10 might be too few for a database administrator using a database management GUI tool, where each query tab and navigation pane may count as a separate session. (Sessions may also be referred to as connections or logons, which for the purposes of this requirement are synonyms.)
STIGDate
IBM DB2 V10.5 LUW Security Technical Implementation Guide2026-05-23

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 4 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (11) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

HRS-02Position Categorization
1.00
HRS-11Separation of Duties (SoD)
1.00
IAC-01Identity & Access Management (IAM)
1.00
IAC-01.2Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA)
1.00
IAC-02Identification & Authentication for Organizational Users
1.00
IAC-03Identification & Authentication for Non-Organizational Users
1.00
IAC-04Identification & Authentication for Devices
1.00
IAC-05Identification & Authentication for Third-Party Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS)
1.00
IAC-08Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
1.00
IAC-21Least Privilege
1.00

+1 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (28) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-10Concurrent Session Control
1.00
AC-12Session Termination
1.00
AC-17(10)Authenticate Remote Commands
1.00
AC-2(1)Automated System Account Management
1.00
AC-2(2)Automated Temporary and Emergency Account Management
1.00
AC-2(3)Disable Accounts
1.00
AC-3Access Enforcement
1.00
AC-3(4)Discretionary Access Control
1.00
AC-7Unsuccessful Logon Attempts
1.00
AU-9Protection of Audit Information
1.00

+18 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

CCI1 mapping
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

Who does this work

8 NICE work roles and 6 EC-Council certifications.

This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.

A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.

Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.

Details

Check Text (C-213670r960735_chk)

Determine whether the system documentation specifies limits on the number of concurrent DBMS sessions per account by type of user. If it does not, assume a limit of 10 for database administrators and 2 for all other users. The DB2 CONNECT_PROC configuration parameter allows the input of a two-part connect procedure name that will implicitly be executed every time an application connects to the database. Find the value of CONNECT_PROC by running the following command: $db2 get db cfg If the value of CONNECT_PROC is null (i.e., not set), this is a finding. If the value of CONNECT_PROC is set, run the following command to review the DDL for the connect procedure: DB2> SELECT text FROM SYSCAT.ROUTINES WHERE ROUTINENAME=<MY_CONNECT> If the connect procedure does not restrict the user sessions as per organization guidelines, this is a finding.

Fix Text (F-14889r295060_fix)

Create the stored procedure per organization guidelines to restrict the number of concurrent sessions using the CREATE or REPLACE procedure: DB2> CREATE or REPLACE PROCEDURE <DBINST1.MY_CONNECT> (Example below.) Update the database CONNECT_PROC parameter to set to the procedure created in previous step: $db2 update db cfg using CONNECT_PROC db2inst1.my_connect Grant execute to the public to connect the procedure. DB2> GRANT EXECUTE ON procedure <schema>.MY_CONNECT_MAIN TO PUBLIC Note: This is an example. Modify and test to comply with organization policy. CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE db2inst1.my_connect_main() BEGIN DECLARE vcount integer; DECLARE vcount_admin integer; SELECT COUNT(*) INTO vcount FROM table(mon_get_connection(NULL, NULL, 0)) WHERE session_auth_id = session_user and application_handle != mon_get_application_handle(); SELECT COUNT(*) INTO vcount_admin FROM table (sysproc.auth_list_authorities_for_authid(session_user,'U')) as t WHERE authority in ('SYSMON','SYSADM','DBADM','SECADM','SYSCTRL','SYSMAINT')and (d_user='Y' OR d_group='Y' OR d_public='Y' OR role_user='Y' or role_group='Y' or role_public='Y' or d_role='Y'); IF (vcount_admin > 0 AND vcount > 5) THEN SIGNAL SQLSTATE '42502' SET MESSAGE_TEXT='Connection refused. More than 5 connections not allowed for admin!'; ELSEIF (vcount > 3 AND vcount_admin = 0) THEN SIGNAL SQLSTATE '42502' SET MESSAGE_TEXT='Connection refused. More than 3 connections not allowed!'; END IF; END @ Note: @ sign in above statement is statement terminator, using db2 –t option, statement terminator can be changed DB2> GRANT EXECUTE ON PROCEDURE db2inst1.my_connect_main TO PUBLIC $db2 UPDATE DB CFG USING CONNECT_PROC db2inst1. my_connect_main