STIGViewer Support

AIX must use Trusted Execution (TE) Check policy.

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-215333AIX7-00-003020SV-215333r958702_ruleCCI-002165medium
Description
Discretionary Access Control (DAC) is based on the notion that individual users are "owners" of objects and therefore have discretion over who should be authorized to access the object and in which mode (e.g., read or write). Ownership is usually acquired as a consequence of creating the object or via specified ownership assignment. DAC allows the owner to determine who will have access to objects they control. An example of DAC includes user-controlled file permissions. When discretionary access control policies are implemented, subjects are not constrained with regard to what actions they can take with information for which they have already been granted access. Thus, subjects that have been granted access to information are not prevented from passing (i.e., the subjects have the discretion to pass) the information to other subjects or objects. A subject that is constrained in its operation by Mandatory Access Control policies is still able to operate under the less rigorous constraints of this requirement. Thus, while Mandatory Access Control imposes constraints preventing a subject from passing information to another subject operating at a different sensitivity level, this requirement permits the subject to pass the information to any subject at the same sensitivity level. The policy is bounded by the information system boundary. Once the information is passed outside the control of the information system, additional means may be required to ensure the constraints remain in effect. While the older, more traditional definitions of discretionary access control require identity-based access control, that limitation is not required for this use of discretionary access control.
STIGDate
IBM AIX 7.x Security Technical Implementation Guide2026-06-15

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 2 frameworks
NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (15) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-3Access Enforcement
1.00
AC-3(13)Attribute-based Access Control
1.00
AC-3(4)Discretionary Access Control
1.00
AC-3(7)Role-based Access Control
1.00
AC-6(10)Prohibit Non-privileged Users from Executing Privileged Functions
1.00
AC-6(8)Privilege Levels for Code Execution
1.00
CM-11(2)Software Installation with Privileged Status
1.00
CM-6Configuration Settings
1.00
CM-7(2)Prevent Program Execution
1.00
CM-7(5)Authorized Software — Allow-by-exception
1.00

+5 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

CCI1 mapping

Details

Check Text (C-215333r958702_chk)

Run the following command to show the current status of the "TE", "CHKEXEC", and "CHKKERNEXT" on the system: # trustchk -p 2>&1 | egrep -e "TE=|CHKEXEC|CHKKERNEXT" The above command should yield the following output: TE=ON CHKEXEC=ON CHKKERNEXT=ON If "TE", "CHKEXEC", or "CHKKERNEXT" is "OFF", this is a finding.

Fix Text (F-16529r294451_fix)

Run the following command to turn on the all parts of Trusted Execution (TE): # trustchk -p TE=on CHKEXEC=on CHKKERNEXT=on