OpenControls Logo

STIG Viewer

STIGViewer Support

The HP FlexFabric Switch must protect against or limit the effects of all known types of Denial of Service (DoS) attacks on the HP FlexFabric Switch management network by employing organization-defined security safeguards.

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-217470HFFS-ND-000118SV-217470r961620_ruleCCI-002385medium
Description
DoS is a condition when a resource is not available for legitimate users. When this occurs, the organization either cannot accomplish its mission or must operate at degraded capacity. This requirement addresses the configuration of network devices to mitigate the impact of DoS attacks that have occurred or are ongoing on device availability. For each network device, known and potential DoS attacks must be identified and solutions for each type implemented. A variety of technologies exist to limit or, in some cases, eliminate the effects of DoS attacks (e.g., limiting processes or restricting the number of sessions the device opens at one time). Employing increased capacity and bandwidth, combined with service redundancy, may reduce the susceptibility to some DoS attacks. The security safeguards cannot be defined at the DoD level because they vary according to the capabilities of the individual network devices and the security controls applied on the adjacent networks (for example, firewalls performing packet filtering to block DoS attacks).
STIGDate
HP FlexFabric Switch NDM Security Technical Implementation Guide2025-06-12

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 4 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (13) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

MON-01Continuous Monitoring
1.00
MON-01.1Intrusion Detection & Prevention Systems (IDS & IPS)
1.00
MON-01.3Inbound & Outbound Communications Traffic
1.00
MON-01.4System Generated Alerts
1.00
MON-01.8Security Event Monitoring
1.00
NET-01Network Security Controls (NSC)
1.00
NET-02Layered Network Defenses
1.00
SEA-01Secure Engineering Principles
1.00
SEA-02Alignment With Enterprise Architecture
1.00
CAP-01Capacity & Performance Management
0.50

+3 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (36) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-10Concurrent Session Control
1.00
AC-17(9)Disconnect or Disable Access
1.00
AC-2(4)Automated Audit Actions
1.00
AC-3Access Enforcement
1.00
AC-4Information Flow Enforcement
1.00
AC-6(9)Log Use of Privileged Functions
1.00
AU-12Audit Record Generation
1.00
AU-3Content of Audit Records
1.00
AU-5Response to Audit Logging Process Failures
1.00
CM-11(2)Software Installation with Privileged Status
1.00

+26 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

CCI1 mapping
CCI-002385
1.00
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (3) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

DE.CM-01
1.00
PR.IR-01
1.00
PR.IR-04
0.50

Who does this work

12 NICE work roles and 9 EC-Council certifications.

This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.

A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.

Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.

Details

Check Text (C-217470r961620_chk)

Check if the HP FlexFabric Switch is configured to protect against known DoS attacks by implementing ACLs and by enabling tcp syn-flood protection: [HP] display current-configuration tcp syn-cookie enable tcp timer syn-timeout 10 [HP] display acl all If the HP FlexFabric Switch is not configured with ACLs and tcp syn-flood features, this is a finding. Check pre-defined qos policies that are by default applied to the control plane: [HP] display qos policy control-plane pre-defined Check user-defined qos policies: [HP] display qos policy user-defined

Fix Text (F-18692r293086_fix)

Configure the HP FlexFabric Switch to protect against or limit the effects of all known types of DoS attacks by employing organization-defined security safeguards. Enable the anti-attack function: [HP] tcp syn-cookie enable Configure maximum wait time to establish a TCP connection: [HP] tcp timer syn-timeout 10 Configure QoS policy and apply it to the control plane: [HP] traffic classifier Net-Protocols operator or [HP-classifier Net-Protocols] if match control-plane protocol icmp [HP-classifier Net-Protocols] quit [HP] traffic behavior Net-Protocols [HP-behavior-Net-Protocols] car cir 320 [HP-behavior-Net-Protocols] quit [HP] qos policy Net-protocols [HP-qospolicy-Net-Protocols] classifier Net-Protocols behavior Net-protocols [HP-qospolicy-Net-Protocols] quit [HP] control-plane slot 1 [HP-cp-slot1] qos apply policy Net-Protocols inbound Note: In addition, ACLs can be deployed to address specific types of attacks based on IP, MAC, protocols and ports. Note: By default, the HP FlexFabric Switches are configured with pre-defined control plane QoS policies, which take effect on the control planes by default.