OpenControls Logo

STIG Viewer

STIGViewer Support

The HP FlexFabric Switch must have Root Guard enabled on all ports where the root bridge should not appear.

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-66063HFFS-L2-000010SV-80553r1_ruleCCI-002385medium
Description
Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) does not provide any means for the network administrator to securely enforce the topology of the switched network. Any switch can be the root bridge in a network. However, a more optimal forwarding topology places the root bridge at a specific predetermined location. With the standard STP, any bridge in the network with a lower bridge ID takes the role of the root bridge. The administrator cannot enforce the position of the root bridge but can set the root bridge priority to 0 in an effort to secure the root bridge position. The root guard feature provides a way to enforce the root bridge placement in the network. If the bridge receives superior STP Bridge Protocol Data Units (BPDUs) on a root guard-enabled port, root guard moves this port to a root-inconsistent STP state and no traffic can be forwarded across this port while it is in this state. To enforce the position of the root bridge it is imperative that root guard is enabled on all ports where the root bridge should never appear.
STIGDate
HP FlexFabric Switch L2S Security Technical Implementation Guide2020-06-03

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 4 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (13) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

MON-01Continuous Monitoring
1.00
MON-01.1Intrusion Detection & Prevention Systems (IDS & IPS)
1.00
MON-01.3Inbound & Outbound Communications Traffic
1.00
MON-01.4System Generated Alerts
1.00
MON-01.8Security Event Monitoring
1.00
NET-01Network Security Controls (NSC)
1.00
NET-02Layered Network Defenses
1.00
SEA-01Secure Engineering Principles
1.00
SEA-02Alignment With Enterprise Architecture
1.00
CAP-01Capacity & Performance Management
0.50

+3 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (36) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-10Concurrent Session Control
1.00
AC-17(9)Disconnect or Disable Access
1.00
AC-2(4)Automated Audit Actions
1.00
AC-3Access Enforcement
1.00
AC-4Information Flow Enforcement
1.00
AC-6(9)Log Use of Privileged Functions
1.00
AU-12Audit Record Generation
1.00
AU-3Content of Audit Records
1.00
AU-5Response to Audit Logging Process Failures
1.00
CM-11(2)Software Installation with Privileged Status
1.00

+26 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

CCI1 mapping
CCI-002385
1.00
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (3) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

DE.CM-01
1.00
PR.IR-01
1.00
PR.IR-04
0.50

Who does this work

12 NICE work roles and 9 EC-Council certifications.

This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.

A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.

Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.

Details

Check Text (C-80553r1_chk)

Review the HP FlexFabric Switch topology as well as the configuration to verify that root guard is enabled on switch ports facing users or switches that are downstream from the root bridge. If the switch has not enabled Root Guard on all ports where the root bridge should not appear, this is a finding. [HP]display stp -------[CIST Global Info][Mode MSTP]------- Bridge ID : 0.bcea-fa14-f0a4 Bridge times : Hello 2s MaxAge 20s FwdDelay 15s MaxHops 20 Root ID/ERPC : 0.bcea-fa14-f0a4, 0 RegRoot ID/IRPC : 0.bcea-fa14-f0a4, 0 RootPort ID : 0.0 BPDU-Protection : Disabled Bridge Config- Digest-Snooping : Disabled TC or TCN received : 19824 Time since last TC : 0 days 1h:3m:4s ----[Port1(GigabitEthernet1/0/1)][DISCARDING]---- Port protocol : Enabled Port role : Designated Port (Boundary) Port ID : 128.1 Port cost(Legacy) : Config=auto, Active=20 Desg.bridge/port : 0.bcea-fa14-f0a4, 128.1 Port edged : Config=disabled, Active=disabled Point-to-Point : Config=auto, Active=true Transmit limit : 10 packets/hello-time TC-Restriction : Disabled Role-Restriction : Disabled Protection type : ROOT

Fix Text (F-72139r1_fix)

Configure the HP FlexFabric Switch to have Root Guard enabled on all ports where the root bridge should not appear. [HP-GigabitEthernet1/0/1]stp root-protection