Deploying Unified Capabilities (UC) soft clients on DOD networks must have authorizing official (AO) approval.
Overview
| Finding ID | Version | Rule ID | IA Controls | Severity |
| V-259908 | SRG-VOIP-000280 | SV-259908r1173934_rule | CCI-003963 | medium |
| Description | ||||
| This use case addresses situations in which UC soft client applications on workstations are not the primary voice communications device in the work area. This means there is a validated mission need and the number of UC soft clients permitted to operate inside the LAN will be less than the number of hardware-based phones in the LAN. This number should be limited to UC soft clients required to meet specific mission requirements. There are scenarios for the use of limited numbers of UC soft clients in the strategic LAN. The first of these scenarios is providing support for UC soft clients associated with a VoIP system in another enclave. This is a remote access scenario and must operate as they would in a normal remote access use case. If this scenario is approved, special accommodations must be made in the local LAN to support users from a remote LAN and permit them to connect to their home enclave. This could include segregating them on a separate dedicated LAN with its own boundary protection or by implementing a dedicated VLAN protection zone while opening the enclave boundary to permit the remote connection. Voice/video and data must reside on separate VLANs for the protection of the voice infrastructure. However, recognizing that requiring a NIC to be configured to support voice/video and data VLANs is not a viable solution, voice and data traffic can coexist in the data VLAN when leaving the workstation. Based on the Unified Capabilities Requirements (UCR) that UC application tag its signaling and media traffic with the proper UCR-defined Differentiated Service Code Point (DSCP), the LAN access switch port can route the UC traffic to the voice/video VLAN. If the LAN access switch is not capable, then routing upstream must perform this. A separate NIC is not required to support VLANs for voice and video segmentation under UC. | ||||
| STIG | Date | |||
| Enterprise Voice, Video, and Messaging Policy Security Requirements Guide | 2025-12-23 | |||
Related Frameworks
1 mapping across 5 frameworks
Related Frameworks
SCF0 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 3 hops (4) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R4intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 186 (2025-11-17)intersects(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 153 (2025-04-07)intersects(normalised)SCF Focal Document mapping (catalog)SCF 2026.2 focalintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R4intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 186 (2025-11-17)intersects(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 153 (2025-04-07)intersects(normalised)SCF Focal Document mapping (catalog)SCF 2026.2 focalintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R4intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 186 (2025-11-17)intersects(normalised)
- SCF Focal Document mapping (catalog)SCF 2026.2 focalintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R4intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
NIST 800-530 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 2 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R4intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
NIST 800-1710 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 3 hops (2) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R4intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2, Appendix DRev 2 (Feb 2020, errata Jan 2021)equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R4intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2, Appendix DRev 2 (Feb 2020, errata Jan 2021)equal to(normalised)
CCI1 mapping
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R4intersects(normalised)
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 3 hops (4) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R4intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 131 (2025-12-12)intersects(normalised)NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 186 (2025-11-17)intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R4intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 131 (2025-12-12)intersects(normalised)NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 186 (2025-11-17)intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R4intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 131 (2025-12-12)intersects(normalised)NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 186 (2025-11-17)intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R4intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 153 (2025-04-07)intersects(normalised)SCF Focal Document mapping (catalog)SCF 2026.2 focalintersects(normalised)
Who does this work
10 NICE work roles and 8 EC-Council certifications.
Who does this work
10 NICE work roles and 8 EC-Council certifications.
This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.
A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.
- DD-WRL-001Cybersecurity Architecture
- DD-WRL-002Enterprise Architecture
- DD-WRL-005Software Security Assessment
- IO-WRL-002Database Administration
- IO-WRL-003Knowledge Management
- IO-WRL-004Network Operations
- IO-WRL-005Systems Administration
- OG-WRL-013Systems Authorization
- OG-WRL-015Technology Portfolio Management
- PD-WRL-004Infrastructure Support
Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.