STIGViewer Support

The Cisco Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) switch must be configured to filter received source-active multicast advertisements for any undesirable multicast groups and sources.

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-221144CISC-RT-000920SV-221144r1137900_ruleCCI-001368low
Description
The interoperability of BGP extensions for interdomain multicast routing and MSDP enables seamless connectivity of multicast domains between autonomous systems. MP-BGP advertises the unicast prefixes of the multicast sources used by Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) switches to perform RPF checks and build multicast distribution trees. MSDP is a mechanism used to connect multiple PIM sparse-mode domains, allowing RPs from different domains to share information about active sources. When RPs in peering multicast domains hear about active sources, they can pass on that information to their local receivers, thereby allowing multicast data to be forwarded between the domains. Configuring an import policy to block multicast advertisements for reserved, Martian, single-source multicast, and any other undesirable multicast groups, as well as any source-group (S, G) states with Bogon source addresses, would assist in avoiding unwanted multicast traffic from traversing the core.
STIGDate
Cisco NX OS Switch RTR Security Technical Implementation Guide2026-03-04

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 5 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (17) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AST-04Network Diagrams & Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs)
1.00
AST-04.2Control Applicability Boundary Graphical Representation
1.00
CFG-02Secure Baseline Configurations
1.00
CRY-01Use of Cryptographic Controls
1.00
DCH-01Data Protection
1.00
DCH-19Geographic Location of Data
1.00
END-01Endpoint Device Management (EDM)
1.00
END-04Malicious Code Protection (Anti-Malware)
1.00
END-06Endpoint File Integrity Monitoring (FIM)
1.00
IAC-21Least Privilege
1.00

+7 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (42) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-2(1)Automated System Account Management
1.00
AC-2(10)Shared and Group Account Credential Change
1.00
AC-2(2)Automated Temporary and Emergency Account Management
1.00
AC-2(3)Disable Accounts
1.00
AC-2(4)Automated Audit Actions
1.00
AC-3Access Enforcement
1.00
AC-3(7)Role-based Access Control
1.00
AC-4Information Flow Enforcement
1.00
AC-6(10)Prohibit Non-privileged Users from Executing Privileged Functions
1.00
AC-6(9)Log Use of Privileged Functions
1.00

+32 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-1710 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

3.1.3
1.00
CCI1 mapping
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (4) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

Who does this work

18 NICE work roles and 10 EC-Council certifications.

This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.

A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.

Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.

Details

Check Text (C-221144r1137900_chk)

Review the switch configuration to determine if there is import policy to block source-active multicast advertisements for any undesirable multicast groups, as well as any (S, G) states with undesirable source addresses. Step 1: Verify that an inbound source-active filter is bound to each MSDP peer. ip msdp peer x.1.28.2 connect-source Ethernet2/1 remote-as nn ip msdp sa-policy x.1.28.2 prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER in Step 2: Review the prefix-list or route-map referenced by the source-active filter to verify that undesirable multicast groups, auto-RP, single source multicast (SSM) groups, and advertisements from undesirable sources are blocked. ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 10 deny 224.0.1.3/32 ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 15 deny 224.0.1.24/32 ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 20 deny 224.0.1.22/32 ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 25 deny 224.0.1.2/32 ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 30 deny 224.0.1.35/32 ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 35 deny 224.0.1.60/32 ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 40 deny 224.0.1.39/32 ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 45 deny 224.0.1.40/32 ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 50 deny 232.0.0.0/8 le 32 ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 55 deny 239.0.0.0/8 le 32 ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 60 deny 10.0.0.0/8 le 32 ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 70 deny 172.16.0.0/12 le 32 ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 75 permit 0.0.0.0/0 ge 8 If the switch is not configured with an import policy to filter undesirable SA multicast advertisements, this is a finding.

Fix Text (F-22848r409922_fix)

Configure the MSDP switch to filter received source-active multicast advertisements for any undesirable multicast groups and sources as shown in the example below: SW1(config)# ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 10 deny 224.0.1.3/32 SW1(config)# ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 15 deny 224.0.1.24/32 SW1(config)# ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 20 deny 224.0.1.22/32 SW1(config)# ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 25 deny 224.0.1.2/32 SW1(config)# ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 30 deny 224.0.1.35/32 SW1(config)# ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 35 deny 224.0.1.60/32 SW1(config)# ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 40 deny 224.0.1.39/32 SW1(config)# ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 45 deny 224.0.1.40/32 SW1(config)# ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 50 deny 232.0.0.0/8 le 32 SW1(config)# ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 55 deny 239.0.0.0/8 le 32 SW1(config)# ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 60 deny 10.0.0.0/8 le 32 SW1(config)# ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 165 deny 127.0.0.0/8 le 32 SW1(config)# ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 70 deny 172.16.0.0/12 le 32 SW1(config)# ip prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER seq 75 permit 0.0.0.0/0 ge 8 SW1(config)# exit SW1(config)# ip msdp sa-policy x.1.28.2 prefix-list INBOUND_MSDP_SA_FILTER in SW1(config)# end