STIGViewer Support

The Cisco BGP router must be configured to reject inbound route advertisements for any prefixes belonging to the local autonomous system (AS).

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-216778CISC-RT-000500SV-216778r1117236_ruleCCI-001368medium
Description
Accepting route advertisements belonging to the local AS can result in traffic looping or being black holed, or at a minimum using a non-optimized path.
STIGDate
Cisco IOS XR Router RTR Security Technical Implementation Guide2025-08-19

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 5 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (17) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AST-04Network Diagrams & Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs)
1.00
AST-04.2Control Applicability Boundary Graphical Representation
1.00
CFG-02Secure Baseline Configurations
1.00
CRY-01Use of Cryptographic Controls
1.00
DCH-01Data Protection
1.00
DCH-19Geographic Location of Data
1.00
END-01Endpoint Device Management (EDM)
1.00
END-04Malicious Code Protection (Anti-Malware)
1.00
END-06Endpoint File Integrity Monitoring (FIM)
1.00
IAC-21Least Privilege
1.00

+7 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (42) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-2(1)Automated System Account Management
1.00
AC-2(10)Shared and Group Account Credential Change
1.00
AC-2(2)Automated Temporary and Emergency Account Management
1.00
AC-2(3)Disable Accounts
1.00
AC-2(4)Automated Audit Actions
1.00
AC-3Access Enforcement
1.00
AC-3(7)Role-based Access Control
1.00
AC-4Information Flow Enforcement
1.00
AC-6(10)Prohibit Non-privileged Users from Executing Privileged Functions
1.00
AC-6(9)Log Use of Privileged Functions
1.00

+32 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-1710 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

3.1.3
1.00
CCI1 mapping
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (4) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

Who does this work

18 NICE work roles and 10 EC-Council certifications.

This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.

A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.

Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.

Details

Check Text (C-216778r1117236_chk)

Review the router configuration to verify that it will reject routes belonging to the local AS. Step 1: verify that an inbound route policy has been configured for each external neighbor as shown in the example below. router bgp xx address-family ipv4 unicast ! neighbor x.1.23.3 remote-as yy keychain YYY_KEY_CHAIN ttl-security address-family ipv4 unicast route-policy BGP_FILTER_INBOUND in ! ! neighbor x.1.24.4 remote-as zz keychain ZZZ_KEY_CHAIN ttl-security address-family ipv4 unicast route-policy BGP_FILTER_INBOUND in ! ! Step 2: Review the route policy to determine if it is filtering at a minimum local prefixes as shown in the example below. route-policy BGP_FILTER_INBOUND if destination in LOCAL_PREFIX then drop else pass endif end-policy Note: If bogons are also filtered per previous requirement, the route policy would look similar to the following example: route-policy BGP_FILTER_INBOUND if destination in BOGON_PREFIXES then drop elseif destination in LOCAL_PREFIX then drop else pass endif end-policy Step 3: Review the prefix set referenced in the route policy above to determine if it includes the local global prefix as shown in the example below. prefix-set LOCAL_PREFIX x.13.1.0/24 le 32 end-set If the router is not configured to reject inbound route advertisements belonging to the local AS, this is a finding.

Fix Text (F-18008r288712_fix)

Step 1: Configure a prefix set containing the current Bogon prefixes as shown below. RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config)#prefix-set Step 1: Configure a prefix set containing the current Bogon prefixes as shown below. RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config)#prefix-set LOCAL_PREFIX RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config-pfx)#x.13.1.0/24 le 32 RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config-pfx)#end-set Step 2: Configure the route policy to drop routes with BOGON prefixes as shown in the example below. RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config)#route-policy BGP_FILTER_INBOUND RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config-rpl)#if destination in LOCAL_PREFIX then RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config-rpl-if)#drop RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config-rpl-if)#else pass endif RRP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config-rpl)#end-policy RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config)#exit Step 3: Apply the route policy to each external BGP neighbor as shown in the example. RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config)#router bgp xx RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config-bgp)#neighbor x.1.23.3 RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config-bgp-nbr)#address-family ipv4 unicast RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config-bgp-nbr-af)#route-policy BGP_FILTER_INBOUND in RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config-bgp)#neighbor x.1.24.4 RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config-bgp-nbr)#address-family ipv4 unicast RP/0/0/CPU0:R2(config-bgp-nbr-af)#route-policy BGP_FILTER_INBOUND in