The MPLS Cisco ACI with Resource Reservation Protocol Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) enabled must be configured with message pacing or refresh reduction to adjust the maximum number of RSVP messages to an output queue based on the link speed and input queue size of adjacent core Cisco ACIs.
Overview
| Finding ID | Version | Rule ID | IA Controls | Severity |
| V-272105 | CACI-RT-000045 | SV-272105r1114299_rule | CCI-001095 | low |
| Description | ||||
| RSVP-TE can be used to perform constraint-based routing when building LSP tunnels within the network core that will support QoS and traffic engineering requirements. RSVP-TE is also used to enable MPLS Fast Reroute, a network restoration mechanism that will reroute traffic onto a backup LSP in case of a node or link failure along the primary path. When there is a disruption in the MPLS core, such as a link flap or router reboot, the result is a significant amount of RSVP signaling, such as "PathErr" and "ResvErr" messages that need to be sent for every LSP using that link. RSVP messages are sent out using either hop-by-hop or with the router alert bit set in the IP header. This means that every router along the path must examine the packet to determine if additional processing is required for these RSVP messages. If there is enough signaling traffic in the network, it is possible for an interface to receive more packets for its input queue than it can hold, resulting in dropped RSVP messages and hence slower RSVP convergence. Increasing the size of the interface input queue can help prevent dropping packets; however, there is still the risk of having a burst of signaling traffic that can fill the queue. Solutions to mitigate this risk are RSVP message pacing or refresh reduction to control the rate at which RSVP messages are sent. RSVP refresh reduction includes the following features: RSVP message bundling, RSVP Message ID to reduce message processing overhead, reliable delivery of RSVP messages using Message ID, and summary refresh to reduce the amount of information transmitted every refresh interval. To configure a rate-limit on RSVP bandwidth on a Cisco ACI interface, use the command "ip rsvp bandwidth" within the interface configuration mode, specifying the desired bandwidth value in kilobits per second (kbps), which will act as the maximum reservable bandwidth for RSVP traffic on that interface. For more granular control, consider creating a dedicated RSVP policy to further define how bandwidth is allocated based on specific traffic characteristics. Optionally, specify a percentage of the interface bandwidth by using the "percent" keyword with the command. | ||||
| STIG | Date | |||
| Cisco ACI Router Security Technical Implementation Guide | 2025-06-18 | |||
Related Frameworks
1 mapping across 4 frameworks
Related Frameworks
SCF0 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 3 hops (2) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
NIST 800-530 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 2 hops (13) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2our copyintersects(normalised)DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R9our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R9intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V10R7our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V10R7intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V3R3our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V3R3intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V10R7our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V10R7intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
+3 more (top 10 by confidence shown)
CCI1 mapping
CCI-001095
1.00
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 4 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
PR.IR-04
0.50
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
- NIST OLIR Informative ReferenceOLIR 153 (2025-04-07)intersects(normalised)SCF Focal Document mapping (catalog)SCF 2026.2 focalintersects(normalised)
Details
Check Text (C-272105r1114299_chk)
Review the router configuration to determine RSVP messages are rate limited.
1. Determine if MPLS TE is enabled globally and at least one interface. To display statistics information for all the interfaces and VRFs in the system, navigate to Tenant >> infra >> Networking >> SR-MPLS Infra L3Outs.
2. Verify the rsvp bandwidth is set.
ip rsvp bandwidth 1000000
If the router with RSVP-TE enabled does not rate limit RSVP messages based on the link speed and input queue size of adjacent core routers, this is a finding.
Fix Text (F-76062r1114113_fix)
Configure rate limit RSVP messages per interface, as shown in the example below:
Syntax: ip rsvp bandwidth <bandwidth_value in kbps>
apic(config)# ip rsvp bandwidth 1000000