STIGViewer Support

A BIND 9.x server must implement NIST FIPS-validated cryptography for provisioning digital signatures and generating cryptographic hashes.

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-272436BIND-9X-002050SV-272436r1137676_ruleCCI-002450medium
Description
Use of weak or untested encryption algorithms undermines the purposes of using encryption to protect data. The application must implement cryptographic modules adhering to the higher standards approved by the federal government since this provides assurance they have been tested and validated.
STIGDate
BIND 9.x Security Technical Implementation Guide2026-02-25

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 5 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (9) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

CFG-02Secure Baseline Configurations
1.00
CRY-01Use of Cryptographic Controls
1.00
CRY-01.1Alternate Physical Protection
1.00
CRY-03Transmission Confidentiality
1.00
CRY-04Transmission Integrity
1.00
CRY-05Encrypting Data At Rest
1.00
DCH-01Data Protection
1.00
IAC-21Least Privilege
1.00
CRY-01.2Export-Controlled Cryptography
0.50
NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (29) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-17(2)Protection of Confidentiality and Integrity Using Encryption
1.00
AC-3Access Enforcement
1.00
AU-9(3)Cryptographic Protection
1.00
CM-5(6)Limit Library Privileges
1.00
CM-6Configuration Settings
1.00
CM-7Least Functionality
1.00
IA-2(8)Access to Accounts — Replay Resistant
1.00
IA-2(9)Network Access to Non-privileged Accounts — Replay Resistant
1.00
IA-3(1)Cryptographic Bidirectional Authentication
1.00
IA-5(1)Password-based Authentication
1.00

+19 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-1710 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

CCI1 mapping
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (3) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

Who does this work

8 NICE work roles and 7 EC-Council certifications.

This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.

A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.

Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.

Details

Check Text (C-272436r1137676_chk)

Verify that the DNSSEC and TSIG keys used by the BIND 9.x implementation are FIPS compliant. If the server is in a classified network, the DNSSEC portion of the requirement is Not Applicable. DNSSEC keys: Inspect the "named.conf" file and identify all of the DNSSEC signed zone files: zone "example.com" { file "signed_zone_file"; }; For each signed zone file identified, inspect the file for the "DNSKEY" records: 86400 DNSKEY 257 3 8 ( <KEY HASH> ) ; KSK; 86400 DNSKEY 256 3 8 ( <KEY HASH> ) ; ZSK; The fifth field in the above example identifies what algorithm was used to create the DNSKEY. If the fifth field, if the KSK DNSKEY is less than "8" (SHA256), this is a finding. If the algorithm used to create the ZSK is less than "8" (SHA256), this is a finding. TSIG keys: Inspect the "named.conf" file and identify all of the TSIG key statements: key tsig_example. { algorithm hmac-SHA256; include "tsig-example.key"; }; If each key statement does not use "hmac-SHA256" or a stronger algorithm, this is a finding.

Fix Text (F-76393r1123955_fix)

Create new DNSSEC and TSIG keys using a FIPS-approved cryptographic algorithm that meets or exceeds the strength of SHA-256.