OpenControls Logo

STIG Viewer

STIGViewer Support

The BIND 9.x server implementation must use separate TSIG key-pairs when securing server-to-server transactions.

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-272421BIND-9X-001700SV-272421r1124019_ruleCCI-000778medium
Description
Without identifying devices, unidentified or unknown devices may be introduced, thereby facilitating malicious activity. This applies to server-to-server (zone transfer) transactions only and is provided by TSIG/SIG(0), which enforces mutual server authentication using a key that is unique to each server pair (TSIG) or using PKI-based authentication (SIG[0]), thus uniquely identifying the other server.
STIGDate
BIND 9.x Security Technical Implementation Guide2026-02-25

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 5 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 4 hops (5) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

IAC-01.2Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA)
1.00
IAC-02Identification & Authentication for Organizational Users
1.00
IAC-03Identification & Authentication for Non-Organizational Users
1.00
IAC-04Identification & Authentication for Devices
1.00
IAC-05Identification & Authentication for Third-Party Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS)
1.00
NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (15) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-17(2)Protection of Confidentiality and Integrity Using Encryption
1.00
AU-10(1)Association of Identities
1.00
CM-6Configuration Settings
1.00
CM-7Least Functionality
1.00
CM-7(9)Prohibiting The Use of Unauthorized Hardware
1.00
IA-11Re-authentication
1.00
IA-3Device Identification and Authentication
1.00
IA-3(1)Cryptographic Bidirectional Authentication
1.00
IA-5(1)Password-based Authentication
1.00
SC-20Secure Name/Address Resolution Service (Authoritative Source)
1.00

+5 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-1710 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (2) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

3.5.1
1.00
3.5.2
1.00
CCI1 mapping
CCI-000778
1.00
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (3) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

PR.AA-01
1.00
PR.AA-03
1.00
PR.AA-05
0.50

Who does this work

7 NICE work roles and 5 EC-Council certifications.

This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.

A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.

Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.

Details

Check Text (C-272421r1124019_chk)

Verify that the BIND 9.x server is configured to use separate TSIG key-pairs when securing server-to-server transactions. Inspect the "named.conf" file for the presence of TSIG key statements: On the primary name server, this is an example of a configured key statement: key tsig_example. { algorithm hmac-SHA256; include "tsig-example.key"; }; zone "disa.mil" { type Primary; file "db.disa.mil"; allow-transfer { key tsig_example.; }; }; On the secondary name server, this is an example of a configured key statement: key tsig_example. { algorithm hmac-SHA256; include "tsig-example.key"; }; server <ip_address> { keys { tsig_example }; }; zone "disa.mil" { type Secondary; Primarys { <ip_address>; }; file "db.disa.mil"; }; Verify that each TSIG key-pair listed is only used by a single key statement: # cat <tsig_key_file> If any TSIG key-pair is being used by more than one key statement, this is a finding.

Fix Text (F-76378r1123575_fix)

Create a separate TSIG key-pair for each key statement listed in the named.conf file. Configure the name server to use separate TSIG key-pairs for each key statement listed in the named.conf file. Restart the BIND 9.x process.