OpenControls Logo

STIG Viewer

STIGViewer Support

On a BIND 9.x server in a split DNS configuration, where separate name servers are used between the external and internal networks, the internal name server must be configured to not be reachable from outside resolvers.

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-272380BIND-9X-001230SV-272380r1124037_ruleCCI-000366medium
Description
Instead of having the same set of authoritative name servers serve different types of clients, an enterprise could have two different sets of authoritative name servers. One set, called external name servers, can be located within a DMZ. These would be the only name servers that are accessible to external clients and would serve RRs pertaining to hosts with public services (web servers that serve external web pages or provide B2C services, mail servers, etc.). The other set, called internal name servers, must be located within the firewall. They must be configured so they are not reachable from outside and therefore provide naming services exclusively to internal clients.
STIGDate
BIND 9.x Security Technical Implementation Guide2026-02-25

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 5 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (8) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

CFG-01Configuration Management Program
1.00
END-01Endpoint Device Management (EDM)
1.00
END-04Malicious Code Protection (Anti-Malware)
1.00
END-06Endpoint File Integrity Monitoring (FIM)
1.00
MON-01Continuous Monitoring
1.00
MON-01.7File Integrity Monitoring (FIM)
1.00
CFG-02Secure Baseline Configurations
0.50
CFG-02.7Approved Configuration Deviations
0.50
NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (100) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AC-12Session Termination
1.00
AC-16(1)Dynamic Attribute Association
1.00
AC-17(1)Monitoring and Control
1.00
AC-2Account Management
1.00
AC-2(1)Automated System Account Management
1.00
AC-2(11)Usage Conditions
1.00
AC-2(3)Disable Accounts
1.00
AC-2(4)Automated Audit Actions
1.00
AC-24(1)Transmit Access Authorization Information
1.00
AC-25Reference Monitor
1.00

+90 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

NIST 800-1710 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (2) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

3.4.1
1.00
3.4.2
1.00
CCI1 mapping
CCI-000366
1.00
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (5) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

DE.CM-09
1.00
PR.PS-01
1.00
PR.DS-10
0.50
PR.PSPlatform Security
0.50
PR.PS-05
0.50

Who does this work

10 NICE work roles and 9 EC-Council certifications.

This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.

A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.

Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.

Details

Check Text (C-272380r1124037_chk)

If the BIND 9.x name server is not configured for split DNS, this is not applicable. Verify that the BIND 9.x server is configured to use the "match-clients" sub-statement to limit the reach of the internal view from the external view. Inspect the "named.conf" file for the following: view "internal" { match-clients { <ip_address> | <address_match_list>; }; }; If the "match-clients" sub-statement is missing for the internal view, this is a finding. If the "match-clients" sub-statement for the internal view does not limit the view to authorized hosts, this is a finding. If any of the IP addresses defined for the "match-clients" sub-statement in the internal view are assigned to external hosts, this is a finding.

Fix Text (F-76337r1123452_fix)

Edit the "named.conf" file. Configure the internal view statement to limit use authorized internal hosts: view "internal" { match-clients { <ip_address> | <address_match_list>; }; }; Remove any IP address that is assigned to an external host from the internal view statement. Restart the BIND 9.x process.