Ax-OS must have no local accounts for the user interface.
Overview
| Finding ID | Version | Rule ID | IA Controls | Severity |
| V-276012 | AXOS-00-000060 | SV-276012r1156548_rule | CCI-000766 | high |
| Description | ||||
| To ensure accountability and prevent unauthenticated access, nonprivileged users must utilize multifactor authentication to prevent potential misuse and compromise of the system. Multifactor authentication uses two or more factors to achieve authentication. Factors include: (i) Something you know (e.g., password/PIN); (ii) Something you have (e.g., cryptographic identification device, token); or (iii) Something you are (e.g., biometric). A nonprivileged account is any information system account with authorizations of a nonprivileged user. Network access is any access to an application by a user (or process acting on behalf of a user) that is obtained through a network connection. Applications that integrate with the DOD Active Directory and use the DOD common access card (CAC) are examples of compliant multifactor authentication solutions. Satisfies: SRG-APP-000150, SRG-APP-000023, SRG-APP-000024, SRG-APP-000025, SRG-APP-000065, SRG-APP-000148, SRG-APP-000153, SRG-APP-000154, SRG-APP-000155, SRG-APP-000156, SRG-APP-000157, SRG-APP-000163, SRG-APP-000175, SRG-APP-000176, SRG-APP-000177, SRG-APP-000178, SRG-APP-000180, SRG-APP-000183, SRG-APP-000318, SRG-APP-000345, SRG-APP-000389, SRG-APP-000391, SRG-APP-000392, SRG-APP-000394, SRG-APP-000395, SRG-APP-000400, SRG-APP-000401, SRG-APP-000402, SRG-APP-000403, SRG-APP-000404, SRG-APP-000405, SRG-APP-000410, SRG-APP-000427, SRG-APP-000580, SRG-APP-000700, SRG-APP-000705, SRG-APP-000710, SRG-APP-000740, SRG-APP-000815, SRG-APP-000820, SRG-APP-000825, SRG-APP-000830, SRG-APP-000835, SRG-APP-000840, SRG-APP-000845, SRG-APP-000850, SRG-APP-000855, SRG-APP-000860, SRG-APP-000865, SRG-APP-000870, SRG-APP-000875, SRG-APP-000880, SRG-APP-000885, SRG-APP-000890 | ||||
| STIG | Date | |||
| Axonius Federal Systems Ax-OS Security Technical Implementation Guide | 2025-11-25 | |||
Related Frameworks
1 mapping across 4 frameworks
Related Frameworks
SCF0 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 3 hops (7) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- SCF Secure Traceability Relationship Mapping (STRM)2026.2intersects
NIST 800-530 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 2 hops (65) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V2R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R1intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2our copyintersects(normalised)
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
+55 more (top 10 by confidence shown)
NIST 800-1710 mappings
No source states a mapping between these directly.
Also reachable in 3 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source
Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.
3.5.3
1.00
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
- DISA CCI List2025-01-23equal to(normalised)
- NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2, Appendix DRev 2 (Feb 2020, errata Jan 2021)equal to(normalised)
CCI1 mapping
CCI-000766
1.00
- DISA STIG Benchmark (XCCDF)V1R2intersects(normalised)
Details
Check Text (C-276012r1156548_chk)
Role-Based Access Control hierarchy is to be defined by the authorizing official (AO). Separation of duties must be configured.
Select the gear icon (System Settings) >> User and Role Management >> Users.
In the list of users, verify there are no users with "Internal" listed in the Source column.
If there are any users with "Internal" in the Source column that have not been documented and approved by the AO, this is a finding.
If all users with "Internal" in the Source column are documented and approved by the AO, or if no users with "Internal" in the Source column exist, this is not a finding.
Fix Text (F-80055r1122685_fix)
Role-Based Access Control hierarchy is to be defined by the AO. Separation of duties must be configured.
Select the gear icon (System Settings) >> User and Role Management >> Users.
After Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)/Single Sign-On (SSO) has been configured, remove all local users.