OpenControls Logo

STIG Viewer

STIGViewer Support

Kona Site Defender must check the validity of all data inputs except those specifically identified by the organization.

Overview

Finding IDVersionRule IDIA ControlsSeverity
V-76451AKSD-WF-000037SV-91147r1_ruleCCI-001310medium
Description
Invalid user input occurs when a user inserts data or characters into an application's data entry fields and the application is unprepared to process that data. This results in unanticipated application behavior, potentially leading to an application or information system compromise. Invalid input is one of the primary methods employed when attempting to compromise an application. Network devices with the functionality to perform application layer inspection may be leveraged to validate data content of network communications. Checking the valid syntax and semantics of information system inputs (e.g., character set, length, numerical range, and acceptable values) verifies that inputs match specified definitions for format and content. Software typically follows well-defined protocols that use structured messages (i.e., commands or queries) to communicate between software modules or system components. Structured messages can contain raw or unstructured data interspersed with metadata or control information. If network elements use attacker-supplied inputs to construct structured messages without properly encoding such messages, the attacker could insert malicious commands or special characters that can cause the data to be interpreted as control information or metadata. Consequently, the module or component that receives the tainted output will perform the wrong operations or otherwise interpret the data incorrectly. Pre-screening inputs prior to passing to interpreters prevents the content from being unintentionally interpreted as commands. Input validation helps to ensure accurate and correct inputs and prevent attacks such as cross-site scripting and a variety of injection attacks. This requirement applies to gateways and firewalls that perform content inspection or have higher-layer proxy functionality.
STIGDate
Akamai KSD Service Impact Level 2 ALG Security Technical Implementation Guide2017-09-15

Related Frameworks

1 mapping across 4 frameworks
SCF0 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (6) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

CFG-02Secure Baseline Configurations
1.00
CRY-01Use of Cryptographic Controls
1.00
DCH-01Data Protection
1.00
IAC-21Least Privilege
1.00
NET-12Safeguarding Data Over Open Networks
0.50
TDA-18Input Data Validation
0.50
NIST 800-530 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 2 hops (11) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

AU-10(1)Association of Identities
1.00
AU-10(2)Validate Binding of Information Producer Identity
1.00
CM-6Configuration Settings
1.00
IA-5(2)Public Key-based Authentication
1.00
SC-13Cryptographic Protection
1.00
SC-20Secure Name/Address Resolution Service (Authoritative Source)
1.00
SC-20(2)Data Origin and Integrity
1.00
SC-21Secure Name/Address Resolution Service (Recursive or Caching Resolver)
1.00
SC-23Session Authenticity
1.00
SC-8(2)Pre- and Post-transmission Handling
1.00

+1 more (top 10 by confidence shown)

CCI1 mapping
CCI-001310
1.00
NIST CSF 2.00 mappings

No source states a mapping between these directly.

Also reachable in 3 hops (1) derived by us, not asserted by any source

Each of these is a route we composed by chaining published mappings. No publisher states a relationship between the two endpoints.

PR.DS-10
1.00

Who does this work

7 NICE work roles and 7 EC-Council certifications.

This is an inference across published mappings, not a single claim by anyone. This check maps to a control, which maps to a Cybersecurity Framework outcome, which NIST assigns to the work roles below. EC-Council separately maps its certifications to those same roles.

A certification prepares someone for a role. It is not evidence that a holder is qualified, and neither NIST nor EC-Council has stated that any certification here addresses this check.

Work-role assignments published by NIST (NICE Framework Components 2.2.0 and the CSF 2.0 OLIR crosswalk). Certification mappings published by EC-Council.

Details

Check Text (C-91147r1_chk)

Confirm Kona Site Defender is configured to block traffic for organizationally defined HTTP protocol violations, HTTP policy violations, SQL injection, remote file inclusion, cross-site scripting, command injection attacks, and any applicable custom rules: 1. Log in to the Akamai Luna Portal (https://control.akamai.com). 2. Click the "Configure" tab. 3. Under the "Security" section, select "Security Configuration". 4. If prompted for which product to use, select "Site Defender" and then "Continue". 5. Under the "Security Configurations" section, click on the most recent version under the "Production" column for the security configuration being reviewed. 6. The detailed "Security Configuration" page will load listing the protected host names and applicable policies. 7. Select the policy being reviewed. 8. Verify the "Application Layer Controls" checkbox is enabled. 9. Verify the following "KRS Rule Set" rules are set to "Deny". - SQL Injection - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) - Command Injection - Invalid HTTP - Remote File Inclusion - PHP Injection (when PHP is used) - Trojan - Total Request Scor4e (Inbound) - Total Response Score (Outbound) - DDOS 10. Verify the "Enabled Slow POST Protection" section appears. If the application layer controls are not set to "Deny" mode or slow POST protection does not appear, this is a finding.

Fix Text (F-83129r1_fix)

Configure the Kona Site Defender to block traffic for organizationally defined HTTP protocol violations, HTTP policy violations, SQL injection, remote file inclusion, cross-site scripting, command injection attacks, and any applicable custom rules. The Akamai Professional Services team should be consulted to implement this Fix content due to the complexities involved. In most cases, this should be included in the SLA. 1. Log in to the Akamai Luna Portal (https://control.akamai.com). 2. Click the "Configure" tab. 3. Under the "Security" section, select "Security Configuration". 4. If prompted for which product to use, select "Site Defender" and then "Continue". 5. Under the "Security Configurations" section, click on the most recent version under the "Production" column for the security configuration being reviewed. 6. The detailed "Security Configuration" page will load listing the protected host names and applicable policies. 7. Select the policy being reviewed and click the "Edit" button. 8. Enable the "Application Layer Controls" box and the "Slow POST Protection" box. 9. Click the "Next" button and set each of the following "KRS Rule Set" rules to "Deny". - SQL Injection - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) - Command Injection - Invalid HTTP - Remote File Inclusion - PHP Injection (when PHP is used) - Trojan - Total Request Score (Inbound) - Total Response Score (Outbound) - DDOS 10. Click the "Next" button and follow the prompts to complete the process.